Studio:
Haiyu-Za Film Production Company Ltd. and Toho, Co., Ltd
Release
date: June 23, 1974 in Hungary, late 1976 in US
In color,
aspect ratio of 2.35 : 1, running time of 120 min.
Genre:
drama, history, war
Keiko
Mitani (played by Komaki Kurihara): young female journalist researching prostitutes in Asian
brothels in early 1900s
Osaki Yamakawa (as old woman played by Kinuyo Tanaka): tells her life story through flashback
Osaki Yamakawa (as old woman played by Kinuyo Tanaka): tells her life story through flashback
Sandakan
No. 8 fits in with
regards to this course, because it is a historical drama that documents wartime
atrocities in Japan. This theme was apparent in Seven Samurai and strongly alluded to in Godzilla. However, unlike The
Burmese Harp and the other wartime films we watched, Sandakan No. 8 focuses on the experiences of Japanese women in war
time. Although we have not watched a film directed by Kei Kumai in this course,
we saw Kinuyo Tanaka’s moving performance as Takai (the young adult sister) in Sansho the Bailiff (1954).
Tanaka began starring in films at 14, and the Japanese studio system allowed her to act in many films; she became an international legend (Fujiwara).Tanaka actually became a director
herself, a daring venture for a Japanese woman at the time.
She directed six films in her career. After taking a trip to the US
and seeing Hollywood, Tanaka was given a 16mm camera and film stock as a coming
home present. Like Sansho the Bailiff, Sandakan No.8 addresses the enslavement of the Japanese peasant
class in order to bolster the empire’s economy and expansionist desires. In Sandakan No. 8, Tanaka plays the old karayuki-san,
Osaki Yamakawa.
The sex trade and enslavement of
women was a taboo subject in Japan, and Tomoko Yamazaki’s book
entitled Sandakan hachiban shokan: teihen joseishi josh, opened up the subject for
discussion. The recruitment of young, poor girls from their villages taken
under false pretense of domestic work occurs all over the world; hence the book
and film have international significance. Currently, 27 million people are enslaved,
and the sex trafficking industry grosses $32 billion dollars a year
(love146.org). According to Warren, “Sandakan Brothel
No. 8 provides both a trans-historical and trans-cultural face for analyzing
prostitution and trafficking in women and children, especially in the
Asian-Pacific region at the end of the 20th century” (16).
In the previous century, Japan’s main exports were silk, coal, and
women (Warren 4). Yamazaki’s book presents a personal account
of a Japanese peasant
girl who went to work in Sandakan, on the east coast of British North Borneo (Sabah,
Malaysia today) (Warren 1). Girls sent abroad became
sex slaves in the empire’s hope that these women could
infiltrate foreign lands. The girls were told that it was their patriotic duty
to remain in Borneo and/or the Asian mainland. Many sent money back home to
support their poor families. In Yamazaki’s story, Osaki is forced into
prostitution at age 13.
Warren
states that Yamazaki’s 1972 book was awarded the Oya Soichi Prize for
Non-Fiction Literature (2). The book quickly became a national best-seller, establishing
Yamazaki as a leading writer on women’s issues. Her book depicts the ordeal of
the Karayuki-san abroad at a time when the “flesh trade” was
flourishing (Warren 2). The film version, Sandakan Brothel No. 8, was
produced by Kumai Kei, and was nominated for an academy award in the Foreign
Film category (Warren 2). Derus Uzala,
by the Japanese filmmaker Akira Kurosawa, won the Oscar that year as the Soviet
Union entry (Malysia.Dreab 4) In the 1975 Kinema Jumpo Awards, Sandakan No.
8 won Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actress for Kinuyo Tanaka
(Malaysia.Dreab 4). Tanaka also won the Best Actress Award at the 25th Berlin International Film Festival, and Kumai received a nomination for Best Director at the festival. Though the book was eventually translated into English, Sandakan
No. 8 has not been commercially released on DVD in the U.S.
(Malysia.Dreab 4). For its trans-national significance on sex-trafficking, which is a major issue abroad and in the U.S., I think that the DVD should be more accessible
to non-Japanese audiences and students.
Keiko
Mitani is a married woman researching the history of Japanese women who were
forced to work in Asian brothels during the early 20th century. She happens
upon Osaki Karasawa in a café and realizes that Osaki was a karayuki-san. Keiko
decides to stay with the old woman, in the hopes of hearing her story. At
first, Osaki is reluctant to share story. That is until a neighbor man sneaks
into their house naked, and Keiko gets a small taste of what it is like to be
violated. “You can’t trust men. Don’t fall in love, no matter what. When you’re
in love you’re blind. All men are the same,” Osaki tells Keiko. The only audible
sound is that of the wind howling, and Osaki begins to tell the story of Sandakan.
Attempting to raise
money for her poor family, Osaki takes a jobs as a maid in the port of Sandakan
at the prompting of Tarozo,
a rich business man in all white suite, top hat, walking stick, and mustache
who appears quite menacing (Malaysia.Dreab 1). The house is
actually a brothel called Sandakan 8, the eighth out of nine brothels in the
port. Osaki works for two years as a maid, but is forced by Tarozo to become a
prostitute.
Before she leaves, Osaki’s mother sews her a kimono to take
with her. Osaki ends up taking apart the kimono to make a mattress; the same
one Keiko sees her use as an old woman. The object takes on a presence, its
significance reminiscent of the objects in Ozu films that appear to gaze upon
the actors. Ozaki’s pipe is also of significance throughout the film. Her
leaving it in a café is the incentive for Keiko to walk with her. Furthermore,
the old woman smokes it throughout the telling of her story. Both the kimono
and the pipe serve to link cuts between the past and the present, providing
some form of continuity to Sandakan No. 8.
Eventually, Osaki falls in love with a young, kind, handsome
Japanese rubber farmer who was also lured to Borneo for work. Osaki even ends up
paying for him to stay the night with her. When a Japanese warship anchors in
the port, this means big business for the brothel. The troops literally storm
Sandakan No. 8, saluting to the woman and yelling, “I’m first.” Afterwards, Osaki
is traumatized, cannot look at her lover, and he deserts her. Soon thereafter,
the Showa era begins and Japan becomes increasingly modernized. The karayuki-san business
dwindles as human trafficking is banned by the government. Osaki then returns to
Japan, only to have her brother say that having karayuki-san in the family is
considered shameful. Though the brother’s house was built with the
money Osaki sent home, she has not rights to it and leaves.
Upon leaving Japan, Osaki goes to Manchuria and marries a
Japanese man. Unfortunately, they lose all their property during WWII and the
husband dies. They have one son who sends Osaki away, because he is ashamed to
introduce her to his bride. After hearing Osaki’s story, Keikyo must leave and
return to her husband and daughter in Tokyo. She tries to give Osaki money, but
Osaki asks for her towel as a token to remember her by instead. This reminds me
of Noriko’s gesture to her mother-in-law in Ozu’s Tokyo Story. It is also an inter-generational offering with the
understanding that the pair will most likely never meet again. As her final
gesture to Osaki, Keikyo visits the cemetery erected for the Japanese women who
died in Sandakan. The scene is shot with still images of the gravestones. This
is followed by black and white, blue-tinted still frames of Sandakan being
destroyed during the war and bodies piled on the ground. The brush is cleared,
and Keikyo sets up a memorial for the women definitively deciding to publish
Osaki’s story.
The cinematography at the beginning of the film shows East
Malaysia as modern place, with airports, automobiles, and a high rise building
where the brothel used to be. Typically, the room is lit by a single electric
hanging bulb, then in Osaki’s brothel room by the lone kerosene lamp. There are
certain reoccurring shots throughout the film: profile two shot of the two
women, tracking aerial shots of women walking outside, slow zoom in on women
seated indoors. The most innovative shots are those with a blacked out
background and a close up on one woman’s face while she speaks.
The film’s editing transitions from the present day to about
50 years ago through the use of flashbacks. One of the very first shots is that
of a plan landing in Malaysia. Like shots of trains in the 1950s, the plane and
cityscape shots are symbols of modernity. In contrast, the flash back scenes
appear more indoors, in a stage-like setting. The camera slowly zooms in on the
characters in darkly lit scenes, making the flashbacks seem dream-like. The
shots of modern Malaysia are contrasted by the mise-en-scene of Osaki’s dingy,
falling apart house filled with stray cats contrasted by the lush greenery that surrounds
it.
The acting in this film is very much about the dynamic
between the two women. There is narration by both Keiko and then Osaki, making
Sandakan No. 8 a story within a story. Kurihara plays Keiko in a very sweet and
polite manner. Though she grimaces at the bugs in the house, she plays with
the cats lovingly and is always extending a hand to help Osaki. She is from
Tokyo, and this is evident by her modern clothes and hair style. On the other hand, Tanaka plays Osaki
as a worn out old woman by hunching over, wearing less modern clothes, and being
very polite in her gestures. However, the old woman shows exuberance and
delight over Keiko’s interest in her story. She is more fidgety, rocks back and forth, and devours her food. She literally hops up and down and rolls
on the floor when Keioko helps fix up the house. At the same time, Osaki often
has a far off look, like she is trying not to think about her past. Close ups on
the women show a variety of facial expressions, small “tells” of how Keioko and Osaki relate to one another.
Sound-wise, the film takes a conservative approach. Only in flash-backs is there non-diegetic music. It is usually light, swelling orchestral
arrangements. Otherwise, there is only the voice-over narration and sounds from
the environment like cats meowing and the bell tolling. In regards to the
audience, the attention is not focused on what one hears, but the facial
expressions and postures of the two women as they navigate through the story
and grow in their friendship.
The
scene I found most cinematically important was when Osaki becomes a prostitute
for the brothel. At first Osaki refuses to “pay her debts” by selling herself,
but Tarozo slaps her with the back of his hand several and chases her around
the house, tearing at her clothes. Tarozo grabs a stick and the two of them
disappear behind a wall. The next shot is an aerial view of a dark, empty
staircase. The shadowed figures of two women appear. The next shot is of Osaki
dressed in white make-up and a colorful dress, ascending the stairs as an karyuki-san.
Osaki stops mid-way, as if she cannot physically move, but she is led up the
stairs by the hand for her first night. When she is placed in a room, Osaki’s
face lifts up slowly, and the light is completely blacked out around her. What
she was looking at is the following shot: the camera begins at the
feet of a man and follows him as he stands up and unfolds his arms, revealing
muscles and many tattoos. There is a close up of his eyes, and soon he forcefully
throws her on the bed. The only sound the audience hears is of the coins he
pays her with rattling to the floor. As the man rapes her, the sole noise comes
from key to the room that the man wears as a necklace. The key jingles and
swings in Osaki’s face. The lights go dim, and orchestral music begins,
followed by an upside down shot of her tormented face. Orchestral music is now
playing in full force. This is followed by a shot of the pouring rain outside.
Osaki collapses in the rain, draped in her robe. The beginning of the subsequent
scene is Osaki in her plain clothes again, lying curled up, exhausted and
drained on the floor. Tarozo comes in to tell her that prostitution is her only
viable option. His final gesture is to rip off the shirt sleeve of Osaki’s
precious kimono.
Overall, Sanadakan
No. 8 enlightens its audience on a hidden part of culture and Japanese
recent past. If the extent of sex trafficking is not researched, how can it be
stopped, prevented, and reparations given to the victim\? Many call Yamazaki a feminist writer,
but I certainly did not see the film as having a feminist agenda. The blame was
not put on the patriarchal society and Japanese government, rather the susceptibility
of impoverished families to give up their children into forced labor. The critique on Japanese
culture comes mainly in the banishment of these women when they tried to return to the homes that sent
them away in the first place, the homes they supported with their wages. Though
Sandakan No. 8 is not a pleasant film
to watch, the message is of grave importance, told in a respectful manner that
does not blame or degrade the exciled karayuki-san.
For more information on
sex trafficking and how to help to end it, visit http://love146.org/
Works Cited
Warren, James F. “New Lands, Old Ties
and Prostitution: A Voiceless Voice. A review essay of Sandakan Brothel No. 8
(book).” Intersections: Gender, History and Culture in the Asian Context 4 (September 2000). http://intersections.anu.edu.au/issue5/sandakan.htmlMalaysia.Dreab. http://malaysia.dreab.com/p-Sandakan_No._8
Fujiwara, Chris. “Love Letter: A
centenary valentine to Japanese screen legend Kinuyo Tanaka.” Museum of the Moving Image (October
2009). http://www.movingimagesource.us/articles/love-letter-20091023
This seems like a film very much related to Japanese culture and the events of its time, which I know little about so I'm not sure how well I can comment on that aspect, but you seem to have done a nice job giving it context. Anyway, sounds like a very interesting film. It seems to have motivated you into looking into the sex trafficking problem, am I correct in this? Very interesting.
ReplyDeleteThanks Nathaniel,
ReplyDeleteI knew about sex trafficking in the US and other countries before I started researching Sandakan No. 8, and I think the film has overarching significance. But Yes, the blossay has motivated me to become more informed/active.
I like how you begin by relating your film to the course. It gave me a baseline of context for your film right away. And you continue to give relevant context for your film before jumping into the film itself through your use of photos and modern connections. One minor critique I want to give is to just reread your writing a little more closely. You spelled Keiko’s name I think at least three different ways throughout your review. Minor errors of this kind tend to undermine your analysis/argument, which is a very important one. The issue of sex-trafficking is certainly still an issue today, and I appreciate how you were able to bring that to light through your review of this film. Also, you said that people describe the writer of the original text as a feminist writer, but that you saw no evidence of feminist critique within the film. However, feminism does not solely extend to the critique of patriarchal society, but also to how women are portrayed within that society. Do you have any comment upon how women were portrayed within the film? Was there any evidence of the male gaze (as through the camera or other characters), or were the women allowed to gaze back?
ReplyDeleteThanks Rebecca,
ReplyDeleteShould have double checked the name spelling :/
Women were portrayed in an autobiographical sense. They told they're story and the visuals were their narrative. Many times the camera was positioned like in Ozu films: lower to the ground gazing at the two women sitting in profile. I would say that the camera's gave was that of the reader (male or female), as the film is a screen adaptation.
I really found this to be very interesting. Sex-trafficking is not a topic in which I'm too familiar with, so I like the fact that you talked about it in a way that was smooth to understand and motivated me to look into some research on it. My question would be, how do you think the lack of music or sound in this movie, as you described nearing the end of your review, played to the movies advantage? How did that affect your reaction towards what was going on?(Sorry it took so long, I've been having problems with Blogger)
ReplyDeleteNo problem Marcus..Thank you,
ReplyDeleteI thought the lack of a music soundtrack in the present day scenes made them seem more real, documentary-like. The overall minimal use of music and sound encouraged the viewer to ponder more, rather than get caught up emotionally. Considering the subject matter, I think this was a successful way to edit the film.